Benchmark: JavaScript Uint8Array to Base64: all

Script Preparation code:

function bytesToBase64ByFileReader(bytes) {
    return new Promise(r => {
        const reader = new FileReader()
        reader.onload = () => r(reader.result)
        reader.readAsDataURL(new Blob([bytes]))
    }).then(url => url.slice(url.indexOf(",") + 1));
}

function bytesToBase64ByBtoa(bytes) {
    return btoa(bytes.reduce((data, byte) => data + String.fromCharCode(byte), ""));
}

function base64UrlEncodeConcat(bytes) {
    let binary = '';
    for (let i = 0; i < bytes.length; i++)
      binary += String.fromCharCode(bytes[i]);
    return btoa(binary);
}

function base64UrlEncodeSpread(bytes) {
    let binary = String.fromCharCode(...bytes);
    return btoa(binary);
}

function base64UrlEncodeApply(bytes) {
    let binary = String.fromCharCode.apply(null, bytes);
    return btoa(binary);
}

function base64UrlEncodeChunk(bytes) {
  let binaryString = '';
  for (let i = 0; i < bytes.length; i += 49152) { // Use chunk size divisible by 3
    binaryString += String.fromCharCode.apply(null, bytes.subarray(i, i + 49152));
  }
  return btoa(binaryString);
}

const bytes1K = new Uint8Array(1024);
for (const bytes of [bytes1K])
    for (let i = 0; i < bytes.length; i += 65536)
        crypto.getRandomValues(bytes.subarray(i, i + 65536));

Tests:

FileReader [Async/Deferred]
await bytesToBase64ByFileReader(bytes1K); deferred.resolve();
btoa
bytesToBase64ByBtoa(bytes1K);
Concat
base64UrlEncodeConcat(bytes1K);
Spread
base64UrlEncodeSpread(bytes1K);
Apply
base64UrlEncodeApply(bytes1K);
Chunk
base64UrlEncodeChunk(bytes1K);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
FileReader
btoa
Concat
Spread
Apply
Chunk

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 7 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/142.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 OPR/126.0.0.0 (Edition developer)

Browser/OS: Opera 126 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Apply

139K/s

Chunk

139K/s

Concat

97K/s

btoa

45K/s

Spread

29K/s

FileReader

3K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Apply	139,072 Ops/sec
Chunk	138,730 Ops/sec
Concat	96,852 Ops/sec
btoa	44,632 Ops/sec
Spread	28,521 Ops/sec
FileReader	3,497 Ops/sec

JavaScript Uint8Array to Base64: all (version: 2)

toBase64 is usually the fastest, but may not be supported by older browsers.

Comparing performance of: `FileReader vs btoa vs Concat vs Spread vs Apply vs Chunk`

Created: 8 months ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

FileReader [Async/Deferred]

btoa

Concat

Spread

Apply

Chunk

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

JavaScript Uint8Array to Base64: all (version: 2)

toBase64 is usually the fastest, but may not be supported by older browsers.

Comparing performance of: FileReader vs btoa vs Concat vs Spread vs Apply vs Chunk

Created: 8 months ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

FileReader [Async/Deferred]

btoa

Concat

Spread

Apply

Chunk

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `FileReader vs btoa vs Concat vs Spread vs Apply vs Chunk`