includes+replace vs replace (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: includes + replace vs just replace

Created: 5 months ago by: Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
Script Preparation code:
Tests:

  • includes + replace

  • just replace

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    includes + replace
    just replace

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: 5 months ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/142.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Chrome 142 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Test name Executions per second
includes + replace 46697712.0 Ops/sec
just replace 9737003.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks: