Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Includes vs startsWith speed test playerapi
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
startsWith vs includes
Created:
5 months ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->
Tests:
startsWith
const str = "playerapi/blabla/blabla2/sjdaldkj/ajdhassdlj/ajshdakjhsd" str.startsWith("playerapi/blabla/blabla2")
includes
const str = "playerapi/blabla/blabla2/sjdaldkj/ajdhassdlj/ajshdakjhsd" str.includes("playerapi/blabla/blabla2")
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
startsWith
includes
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
5 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/140.0.0.0 YaBrowser/25.10.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Yandex Browser 25 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
startsWith
66967044.0 Ops/sec
includes
267209872.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
Array.includes vs String.match
Array.includes vs String.match
Includes vs ===
startswith vs includes vs not match includes
javascript startsWith() vs includes() for longer string
String.includes vs String.match 2
String.includes vs String.match 3
String.includes vs String.match vs String.indexOf
includes vs slice vs startsWith
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?