Benchmark: Array.some() vs Array.map().includes()

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

const arrayLength = 50;
const randomIndexForIdToFind = Math.random() * (arrayLength - 1) + 1;
const idToFind = 'foo';

const arr = [];

for (let i = 0; i < arrLength ; i++) {
  if (i === randomIndexForIdToFind) {
    arr.push({ foo: { id: idToFind }});
  } else {
    arr.push({ foo: { id: 'bar' }});
  }
}

Tests:

Array.map().includes()
arr.map(e => e.foo.id).includes(idToFind);
Array.some()
arr.some(e => e.foo.id === idToFind);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Array.map().includes()
Array.some()

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 8 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:145.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/145.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 145 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Array.some()

1828.2M/s

Array.map().includes()

122.4M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Array.some()	1,828,167,296 Ops/sec
Array.map().includes()	122,370,088 Ops/sec

Array.some() vs Array.map().includes() (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `Array.map().includes() vs Array.some()`

Created: 8 months ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Array.map().includes()

Array.some()

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Array.some() vs Array.map().includes() (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Array.map().includes() vs Array.some()

Created: 8 months ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Array.map().includes()

Array.some()

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Array.map().includes() vs Array.some()`