Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
indexOf() vs. includes()
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
indexOf() vs includes()
Created:
5 months ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->
Script Preparation code:
let haystack = new Array("one", "two", "three", "four", "five", "six", "seven", "eight", "nine", "ten"); let needle = "six";
Tests:
indexOf()
haystack.indexOf(needle) > -1
includes()
haystack.includes(needle)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
indexOf()
includes()
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:147.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/147.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 147 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
indexOf()
42195024.0 Ops/sec
includes()
39501400.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
index of
Includes vs indexOf
Includes vs. IndexOf
Includes vs. IndexOf v2
IndexOfArray
empty array diff
Includes vs Ternary Comparison
> _.includes() vs [].includes() <
IndexOf vs Includes in function
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?