Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
new Jquery, Vanilla hide show
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
jquery vs vanilla
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div id="Stupid_Div"> Stupid Crap </div> <script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js'></script>
Tests:
jquery
$('#Stupid_Div').hide().show().hide();
vanilla
var hide = "none", show = "block", elem = document.getElementById("Stupid_Div"); elem.style.display = hide; elem.style.display = show; elem.style.display = hide;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
jquery
vanilla
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested. **Benchmark Definition:** The provided benchmark definition includes two scripts that demonstrate the hiding and showing of an HTML element using two different approaches: 1. Using jQuery (`$('#Stupid_Div').hide().show().hide();`) 2. Using vanilla JavaScript (`var hide = "none", show = "block", elem = document.getElementById("Stupid_Div"); elem.style.display = hide; elem.style.display = show; elem.style.display = hide;`) **Options being compared:** The two options being compared are: 1. **jQuery**: A popular JavaScript library that provides a simple way to manipulate the DOM. 2. **Vanilla JavaScript**: The standard JavaScript syntax, without any libraries or frameworks. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** **jQuery:** Pros: * Easy to use and familiar interface * Provides a lot of functionality out of the box * Fast execution Cons: * Adds an extra layer of overhead due to the library itself * Requires an additional HTTP request to load the library * May not be suitable for small projects or those with specific requirements **Vanilla JavaScript:** Pros: * No added overhead from a library * Can be more flexible and customizable * No dependencies on external resources Cons: * Steeper learning curve due to the standard syntax * Requires manual handling of DOM manipulation * May not be as fast due to the lack of optimization by the browser. **Library Used:** In this case, jQuery is used. jQuery is a JavaScript library that provides a simple way to manipulate the DOM, interact with elements, and perform animations. It also includes functionality for event handling, DOM traversal, and manipulation. **Special JS Feature or Syntax:** There are no special features or syntaxes mentioned in the benchmark definition. The focus is on comparing the performance of jQuery vs vanilla JavaScript for hiding and showing an HTML element. **Other Alternatives:** If you're interested in exploring other alternatives, here are a few options: * **Lodash**: A popular utility library that provides a lot of functionality for common tasks. * **React**: A JavaScript library for building user interfaces. * **Angular**: A JavaScript framework for building single-page applications. Keep in mind that each of these libraries has its own strengths and weaknesses, and may not be suitable for all use cases.
Related benchmarks:
Old Jquery, Vanilla hide show
visibility vs display
visibility vs display 2
Classlist remove
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?