Benchmark: dfsfdsfsdfsdffs - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

const obj = { value: 1 };

obj.update = updateSelf.bind(obj);

function updateStatic(object, value) { object.value = value; };
function updateSelf(value) { this.value = value; }

Tests:

Use static
updateStatic(obj, Math.random());
Use bound
obj.update(Math.random());

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Use static
Use bound

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/139.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 OPR/123.0.0.0

Browser/OS: Opera 123 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Use static	111876480.0 Ops/sec
Use bound	110443016.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Doc Testing
Testy Test
Testing lodash methods
jfsdgdg
jfsdgdgg
Object.assign vs direct assignment 2
ObjectDefineProperty
Object.create(null) vs {} unknown property
State Key Creation (With Preparation Code)

dfsfdsfsdfsdffs (version: 1)

dsgfsdfsdfsdfsdf

Comparing performance of: Use static vs Use bound

Created: 5 months ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Use static

Use bound

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A