Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Reduce: concat vs push vs flatMap
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
Reduce + push vs Reduce + concat vs Flatmap
Created:
6 months ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
a = new Array(1000).fill(0).map(() => ({ value: Math.random(), keep: Math.random() > 0.5 }));
Tests:
Reduce + push
a.reduce((acc, { value, keep }) => { if (keep) { acc.push(value); } return acc; }, []);
Reduce + concat
a.reduce((acc, { value, keep }) => (keep ? acc.concat([value]) : acc), []);
Flatmap
a.flatMap((acc, { value, keep }) => (keep ? [value] : []), []);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Reduce + push
Reduce + concat
Flatmap
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
6 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/142.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/142.0.0.0
Browser/OS:
Chrome 142 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Reduce + push
125116.9 Ops/sec
Reduce + concat
4707.4 Ops/sec
Flatmap
113586.9 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
filter + map vs reduce 1234567
flatMap vs reduce 1111
flatMap vs reduce 1111111
flatMap vs reduce 999
flatMap vs reduce 999912345
flatMap vs reduce 99991234
filter + map vs reduce 123456735235
filter + map vs reduce 123456735235125
Reduce: concat vs push
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?