RegEx.test vs. String.lower.includes vs. String.match vs. String.upper.includes (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: RegEx.test vs String.toLowerCase.includes vs String.match vs string.toUpperCase.includes

Created: 9 months ago by: Guest
Go to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
Tests:
Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    RegEx.test
    String.toLowerCase.includes
    String.match
    string.toUpperCase.includes

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: 9 months ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/141.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Chrome 141 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
String.toLowerCase.includes
164.8M/s
string.toUpperCase.includes
162.9M/s
RegEx.test
27.8M/s
String.match
6.8M/s
View exact numbers
Test name Executions per second
✓ String.toLowerCase.includes 164,834,144 Ops/sec
string.toUpperCase.includes 162,946,704 Ops/sec
RegEx.test 27,833,412 Ops/sec
String.match 6,805,280 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks