Benchmark: normal function with/without arguments/eval

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

let bigNum = 1e7
let a = function closure() {
    let big = Array(bigNum).fill(2)
    let big2 = Array(bigNum).fill(2)
    let big3 = Array(bigNum).fill(2)
    return function(a, b) {
        true || true
        return a + b
    }
}()
let b = function closure() {
    let big = Array(bigNum).fill(2)
    let big2 = Array(bigNum).fill(2)
    let big3 = Array(bigNum).fill(2)
    return function(a, b) {
        true || eval('never reached')
        return a + b
    }
}()
let c = function closure() {
    let big = Array(bigNum).fill(2)
    let big2 = Array(bigNum).fill(2)
    let big3 = Array(bigNum).fill(2)
    return function(a, b) {
        true || arguments.callee
        return a + b
    }
}()

Tests:

normal
a(1,2,3,4,5,6,7)
eval
b(1,2,3,4,5,6,7)
arguments
c(1,2,3,4,5,6,7)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
normal
eval
arguments

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 6 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/142.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 142 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
normal	207100544.0 Ops/sec
eval	184830432.0 Ops/sec
arguments	183700608.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

normal function with/without arguments/eval (version: 1)

hypothesis: having arguments/direct eval in a function body makes it slower(?)

Comparing performance of: normal vs eval vs arguments

Created: 6 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

normal

eval

arguments

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A