Benchmark: lodash.each vs ES6 FOR vs Native - v.2

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/lodash/4.16.0/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var value = {a: 30310, b: 100303, c: 3040494}

Tests:

lodash.each
_.each(value, function(v,i) {})
ES6
for (const key of Object.keys(value)) {}
Native
Object.keys(value).forEach(function(key) {})

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
lodash.each
ES6
Native

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 10 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/141.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 141 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

ES6

98.6M/s

Native

96.5M/s

lodash.each

27.4M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ ES6	98,551,408 Ops/sec
Native	96,461,400 Ops/sec
lodash.each	27,397,206 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON data to understand what is being tested and the different approaches compared.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark measures the performance of three approaches:

1. `_.each` from Lodash: a functional programming library that provides utility functions for working with arrays, objects, and more.
2. ES6 `for...of` loop: a built-in JavaScript loop that iterates over iterable objects like arrays and sets.
3. Native ( Firefox's own implementation): the optimized version of the loop used by Firefox itself.

**Options Compared**

The benchmark compares these three approaches on the same test data, which is an object with three properties (`a`, `b`, and `c`). The goal is to measure how many executions per second each approach can perform on this data.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach:**

1. **Lodash `.each`**: This method uses a functional programming style to iterate over the object's properties. It's concise and readable, but may incur overhead due to the function call and object lookups.
	* Pros: easy to write and understand, flexible, and works with various data types.
	* Cons: slower than native loops due to additional overhead.
2. **ES6 `for...of` loop**: This is a built-in JavaScript loop that's designed for modern JavaScript development. It's efficient and readable but may require more setup compared to Lodash.
	* Pros: fast, lightweight, and widely supported across browsers and platforms.
	* Cons: requires knowledge of the specific syntax and may not work with older JavaScript versions or specific browser implementations.
3. **Native (Firefox's implementation)**: This is the optimized loop used by Firefox itself. It's likely to be the fastest option but may require more expertise to understand and optimize.

**Library Used**

The `lodash.each` function is part of the Lodash library, which provides a collection of functional programming utilities for working with arrays, objects, and more. The library aims to provide a consistent and predictable way to perform common operations, making it easier to write concise and readable code.

**Special JavaScript Feature or Syntax**

There's no specific special feature or syntax mentioned in the benchmark data. However, note that ES6 introduces several new features, including `for...of`, `const`, `let`, and others, which can be used to simplify and improve code readability.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternative implementations or approaches, consider:

* Using a different JavaScript library, like Underscore.js (similar to Lodash) or Ramda.
* Exploring other iteration methods, such as `forEach` on the array itself or using `map()` and `reduce()`.
* Implementing a custom loop optimized for your specific use case.

Keep in mind that benchmark results may vary depending on the specific test data, browser versions, and platform configurations.

lodash.each vs ES6 FOR vs Native - v.2 (version: 0) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: `lodash.each vs ES6 vs Native`

Created: 8 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

lodash.each

ES6

Native

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

lodash.each vs ES6 FOR vs Native - v.2 (version: 0) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: lodash.each vs ES6 vs Native

Created: 8 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

lodash.each

ES6

Native

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `lodash.each vs ES6 vs Native`