RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match case sensitive2 (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: RegEx.test vs String.includes vs String.match

Created: 6 months ago by: Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
Tests:

  • RegEx.test

  • String.includes

  • String.match

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    RegEx.test
    String.includes
    String.match

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: 6 months ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/141.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Chrome 141 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Test name Executions per second
RegEx.test 61247128.0 Ops/sec
String.includes 69843304.0 Ops/sec
String.match 8682265.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks: