Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match case sensitive2
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
RegEx.test vs String.includes vs String.match
Created:
9 months ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var string = "Hello world!"; var regex = /hello/i;
Tests:
RegEx.test
regex.test(string);
String.includes
string.toLocaleLowerCase().includes("Hello");
String.match
string.toLocaleLowerCase().match("hello");
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
RegEx.test
String.includes
String.match
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
9 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/141.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 141 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=618915" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
String.includes
69.8M/s
RegEx.test
61.2M/s
String.match
8.7M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
String.includes
69,843,304 Ops/sec
RegEx.test
61,247,128 Ops/sec
String.match
8,682,265 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match insensitive
RegEx.test vs. String.toLowerCase().includes vs. String.match
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match with lowercase
RegEx.test vs. String.includes 3
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?