Benchmark: foreach: object keys vs object entries vs for...in

Script Preparation code:

var obj = {};
const TXT = "ASDFASFASDFASDFSADFASDFASDFSDAFSDFASDFASDFASDFASDF";

const newObj = {};

for (i = 0; i < 10000; ++i) {
  obj[i] = `${i} ${TXT}`;
}

Tests:

object with keys
Object.keys(obj).forEach( (key) => { newObj[key] = obj[key]; } );
object with entries 1
Object.entries(obj).forEach( (entry) => { newObj[entry.key] = entry.value; } );
object with entries 2
Object.entries(obj).forEach( ([key, value]) => { newObj[key] = value; } );
for...in
for (const key in obj) { newObj[key] = obj[key] }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
object with keys
object with entries 1
object with entries 2
for...in

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 7 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/140.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 140 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
object with keys	75953.2 Ops/sec
object with entries 1	33171.6 Ops/sec
object with entries 2	33873.6 Ops/sec
for...in	56667.3 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

foreach: object keys vs object entries vs for...in (version: 2)

Comparing performance of: object with keys vs object with entries 1 vs object with entries 2 vs for...in

Created: 7 months ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

object with keys

object with entries 1

object with entries 2

for...in

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A