Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
for with continue vs for over a .filter
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
for with continue vs for with .filter
Created:
7 months ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->
Script Preparation code:
const array = new Array(100).fill(1).map(_, index => index)
Tests:
for with continue
let sum = 0 for (const el of array){ if (el % 2 !== 0) continue; sum =+ el; }
for with .filter
let sum = 0 for (const el of array.filter(x => x % 2 === 0)){ sum =+ el }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
for with continue
for with .filter
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
7 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/18.6 Safari/605.1.15
Browser/OS:
Safari 18 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
for with continue
283364.9 Ops/sec
for with .filter
255516.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
for vs foreach vs map vs (map, filter reduce)
forEach vs reduce vs for vs map and filter
Storing array length before for
for/for in/forEach array sum
for/for in/forEach array sum 222
for/for len
forEach vs reduce vs map vs filter vs for (to build an array)
For let vs var vs const
for with continue vs for over a .filter (v2)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?