Benchmark: sessionStorage vs top.name

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

var a = sessionStorage.setItem.bind(sessionStorage,'a'),
    b = sessionStorage.getItem.bind(sessionStorage, 'a'),
    c = Reflect.set.bind(Reflect, top, 'a'),
    d = Reflect.get.bind(Reflect, top, 'a')

Tests:

sessionStorage
for(let i = 5; i--;) a(i), b()
top.name
for(let i = 5; i--;) c(i), d()

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
sessionStorage
top.name

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 10 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/140.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 140 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

top.name

1.7M/s

sessionStorage

18K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ top.name	1,744,609 Ops/sec
sessionStorage	18,271 Ops/sec

sessionStorage vs top.name (version: 1)

top.name has the same lifetime as sessionStorage

Comparing performance of: `sessionStorage vs top.name`

Created: 10 months ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

sessionStorage

top.name

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

sessionStorage vs top.name (version: 1)

top.name has the same lifetime as sessionStorage

Comparing performance of: sessionStorage vs top.name

Created: 10 months ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

sessionStorage

top.name

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `sessionStorage vs top.name`