Benchmark: array find vs ??

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

/*your preparation JavaScript code goes here
To execute async code during the script preparation, wrap it as function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction, example:*/
async function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction() {
    // This function is optional, feel free to remove it.
    // await someThing();
}

Tests:

array find
const b = { at: {}, et: {}, st: { start: "1" }} const variable = [b.at?.start, b.et?.start, b.st?.start].find(e => e != null);
??
const b = { at: {}, et: {}, st: { start: "1" }} const variable = b.at?.start ?? b.et?.start ?? b.st?.start;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
array find
??

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 11 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/140.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 140 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

array find

233.9M/s

225.3M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ array find	233,939,120 Ops/sec
??	225,268,112 Ops/sec

array find vs ?? (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `array find vs ??`

Created: 11 months ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

array find

??

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

array find vs ?? (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: array find vs ??

Created: 11 months ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

array find

??

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `array find vs ??`