Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
converting val to str
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
template vs concatenation vs concat() vs String()
Created:
8 months ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->
Script Preparation code:
let concat = ''.concat.bind('')
Tests:
template
`${alert}`
concatenation
alert+''
concat()
concat(alert)
String()
String(alert)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
template
concatenation
concat()
String()
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
8 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/140.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 140 on Linux
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
template
10879431.0 Ops/sec
concatenation
9124577.0 Ops/sec
concat()
10048223.0 Ops/sec
String()
8336658.5 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
concatvsnoconcat
String concat – `` vs concat
sdstring concat speed
Array join vs string contat
Native JS: concatenate string with + vs template literals vs String.concat edit 2 concat
Native JS: concatenate string with + vs template literals vs String.concat edit 2 concat 80
plus vs template literals vs String.concat
shvaer Native JS: concatenate string with + vs template literals vs String.concat
shvaer Native JS: concatenate string with + vs template literals vs String.concat 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?