Benchmark: Object.keys vs Object.entries Length

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

function makeid() {
  var text = "";
  var possible = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789";

  for (var i = 0; i < 5; i++)
    text += possible.charAt(Math.floor(Math.random() * possible.length));

  return text;
}

window.parentObj = {};

for (let i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
	window.parentObj[makeid()] = makeid();
}

Tests:

Object.keys
Object.keys(window.parentObj).map((k) => window.parentObj[k].length > 0);
Object.entries
Object.entries(window.parentObj).map(([k, v]) => v.length > 0);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Object.keys
Object.entries

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 11 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/139.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 139 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Object.keys

679K/s

Object.entries

186K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Object.keys	678,852 Ops/sec
Object.entries	186,025 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated 11 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

The provided benchmark compares the performance of two different JavaScript methods for extracting information from an object: `Object.keys` and `Object.entries`. Both approaches are commonly used in JavaScript but serve slightly different purposes and have different performance characteristics.

### What Is Tested:
1. **Object.keys**: This method retrieves an array of the object's own enumerable property names (keys). The benchmark case then maps over these keys to check if the length of their corresponding values in `window.parentObj` is greater than zero.
   
   - **Test Case**: 
     ```javascript
     Object.keys(window.parentObj).map((k) => window.parentObj[k].length > 0);
     ```

2. **Object.entries**: This method retrieves an array of the object's own enumerable property `[key, value]` pairs. The benchmark checks the length of the values directly in a similar manner.
   
   - **Test Case**:
     ```javascript
     Object.entries(window.parentObj).map(([k, v]) => v.length > 0);
     ```

### Comparison of Options:
- **Pros of `Object.keys`**:
  - Simpler and possibly faster in retrieving just the keys of the object.
  - It's widely supported and known, making it easier for developers.
  
- **Cons of `Object.keys`**:
  - Requires an additional lookup to fetch the value associated with each key.
  
- **Pros of `Object.entries`**:
  - Retrieves both keys and values in one call, which can be more efficient, particularly when you need to use both in subsequent logic.
  
- **Cons of `Object.entries`**:
  - Slight complexity when handling the output since you're dealing with arrays of key-value pairs.
  
### Performance Insights:
From the benchmark results:
- `Object.keys` performed significantly better with **678,852.31 Executions Per Second** compared to **186,025.45 Executions Per Second** for `Object.entries`. This indicates that in this specific scenario, where you're only concerned with the values of `window.parentObj`, `Object.keys` has a clear performance advantage.

### Libraries and Features:
No external libraries are used in this benchmark; it solely relies on native JavaScript methods provided by the ECMAScript specification.

### Alternatives:
- **For..in Loop**: You could also use a `for..in` loop to iterate over the object's keys. While it allows more control and can sometimes be more efficient when paired with certain operations, it's generally less performant in cases where you need to filter or transform values.
  
- **Object.values**: If the primary interest is only in the values of the object, `Object.values` could serve as a straightforward alternative. However, the benchmark didn't explicitly test `Object.values` as it focuses on the relation between keys and their corresponding values.

### Conclusion:
The benchmark effectively highlights the performance differentials between `Object.keys` and `Object.entries`, focusing on how they can be used to manipulate and query object data. For situations where only the keys are needed, `Object.keys` can offer significant performance benefits. However, if both keys and values are essential, `Object.entries` may provide a more concise syntax at the cost of performance. Software engineers should consider the use case when deciding which method to implement.

Object.keys vs Object.entries Length (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `Object.keys vs Object.entries`

Created: 11 months ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

Object.keys

Object.entries

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated 11 months ago):

Object.keys vs Object.entries Length (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Object.keys vs Object.entries

Created: 11 months ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

Object.keys

Object.entries

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated 11 months ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Object.keys vs Object.entries`