Benchmark: es6 vs lodash - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/g/lodash@4(lodash.min.js+lodash.fp.min.js)'></script>

Script Preparation code:

function double(n) {
	return n*2;
}

var data = [...Array(20)].map((v, idx) => idx);

Tests:

lodash fp map
_.map(double, data);
lodash fp map composed
_.map(double)(data);
es6 map
data.map(double)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
lodash fp map
lodash fp map composed
es6 map

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**Benchmark Explanation**

The provided benchmark compares the performance of two approaches: using native JavaScript (`es6`) and using the `lodash` library with functional programming (FP) capabilities.

**Options Compared**

1. **Native JavaScript (es6)**: This approach uses the built-in `map()` function in JavaScript, which applies a given function to each element of an array.
2. **Lodash FP Map**: This approach uses the `_map()` function from Lodash, a popular utility library for JavaScript, along with functional programming techniques.
3. **Lodash FP Map Composed**: This approach composes two functions using `_.pipe()`, which applies the functions in sequence to each element of an array.

**Pros and Cons**

1. **Native JavaScript (es6)**:
	* Pros: Native performance, easy to read and write code.
	* Cons: Limited functionality compared to Lodash FP Map.
2. **Lodash FP Map**:
	* Pros: Provides additional functional programming features, easier to write composable functions.
	* Cons: Adds overhead due to the library, may be slower than native JavaScript.
3. **Lodash FP Map Composed**:
	* Pros: Allows for more complex function compositions, can lead to more efficient code.
	* Cons: May add additional overhead due to the complexity of the composed functions.

**Library and Purpose**

The `lodash` library is a popular utility library for JavaScript that provides a wide range of functional programming features. The `_map()` function in Lodash applies a given function to each element of an array, similar to the native `map()` function in JavaScript. However, Lodash's implementation may have additional overhead due to its caching and memoization mechanisms.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

None mentioned in this benchmark.

**Other Alternatives**

For those interested in exploring alternative approaches, here are a few options:

* Using other functional programming libraries like Ramda or FP.js.
* Implementing your own custom `map()` function using recursion or iteration.
* Using alternative array methods like `forEach()` or `reduce()`.
* Experimenting with other optimization techniques, such as memoization or caching.

Related benchmarks:

es6 vs lodash (version: 0)

es6 vs lodash

Comparing performance of: lodash fp map vs lodash fp map composed vs es6 map

Created: 7 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

lodash fp map

lodash fp map composed

es6 map

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):