Benchmark: RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match with long content

Script Preparation code:

var string = "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Velit accusamus, ex, et perferendis nam delectus eaque impedit voluptate cumque ipsam assumenda, eos atque. Ipsa maiores sunt obcaecati, hic veritatis aut? Lorem ipsum dolor, sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Fuga, tempore tenetur quo dolore rerum consectetur asperiores adipisci illum nobis cupiditate sint! Perferendis soluta error minima quo impedit rem tempore ratione? Lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Expedita voluptates voluptate architecto beatae ex tempore, voluptatem sit minus aut reprehenderit doloremque est fugit odio harum deleniti id excepturi asperiores laborum! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Velit illo recusandae quidem provident ad culpa minima, quam doloremque odit nobis ipsa excepturi maxime magni eligendi optio modi soluta! Fugiat, voluptatibus. Lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Maiores minima dolore tempore, repudiandae ipsum distinctio officiis quo voluptatibus, provident assumenda nihil dolores possimus quia tenetur, praesentium consectetur reprehenderit doloremque quam. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Eveniet, tenetur similique? Magni tenetur dolorem accusamus provident eligendi distinctio, modi necessitatibus nesciunt minus pariatur, quos iste laborum obcaecati? Dolor, omnis sed.";
var regex = /this is a test/;

Tests:

RegEx.test
regex.test(string);
String.includes
string.includes("this is a test");
String.match
string.match("this is a test");

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
RegEx.test
String.includes
String.match

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 8 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/139.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 139 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
RegEx.test	1654292.8 Ops/sec
String.includes	117010704.0 Ops/sec
String.match	838589.6 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match with long content (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: RegEx.test vs String.includes vs String.match

Created: 8 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

RegEx.test

String.includes

String.match

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A