Benchmark: Async Serial vs Parallel

Script Preparation code:

async function getValue(value) {
    return new Promise(resolve => {
        setTimeout(() => {
            resolve(value);
        }, 1000);
    });
}

Tests:

Serial [Async/Deferred]
const a = await getValue(1) const b = await getValue(2) console.log(a + b) deferred.resolve()
Parallel [Async/Deferred]
const a = getValue(1) const b = getValue(2) console.log(await a + await b) deferred.resolve()

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Serial
Parallel

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 10 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/137.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 OPR/122.0.0.0 (Edition developer)

Browser/OS: Opera 122 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Serial	0.5 Ops/sec
Parallel	1.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Multipromise resulter
async for vs promise all (setTimeout version)
async for vs promise.all2
async for vs promise.all /w delay
Awaiting sync vs async 2
async for vs promise.all vs for await
Error handling in async await vs old way
promise vs callback vs async
Async Test

Async Serial vs Parallel (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Serial vs Parallel

Created: 10 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Serial [Async/Deferred]

Parallel [Async/Deferred]

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A