Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
for vs foreach vs some vs for..of vs for with cached length
(version: 1)
Compare loop performance
Comparing performance of:
for vs foreach vs some vs for..of vs for with cached length
Created:
9 months ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var array = new Array(100);
Tests:
for
for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i += 1) { array[i]; }
foreach
array.forEach(function(i) { array[i]; });
some
array.some(function(i) { array[i]; });
for..of
for (var i of array) { array[i]; }
for with cached length
for (var i = 0, end = array.length; i < end; i += 1) { array[i]; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (5)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
for
foreach
some
for..of
for with cached length
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
9 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:140.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/140.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 140 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=614097" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Test name
Executions per second
for
20698280.0 Ops/sec
foreach
7517727.0 Ops/sec
some
12567482.0 Ops/sec
for..of
1380676.2 Ops/sec
for with cached length
19945734.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
for vs foreach vs some vs for..of
for cached vs foreach vs some vs for..of
for vs foreach vs some vs for..of 1000
for vs foreach vs some vs for..of vs for cached length
for vs for with cached length vs foreach vs for..of
loops: for vs foreach vs some vs for..of
for vs for cached length vs foreach vs some vs for..of
for vs foreach vs for..of vs for cached
for vs foreach vs some vs for..of 1
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?