Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash.js vs Native 117
(version: 1)
Test
Comparing performance of:
Spread vs Get on each one
Created:
10 months ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
const result = { data: { a: 1, b: 2, c: 3 } }
Tests:
Spread
const { a, b, c } = _.get(result, 'data', {}) console.log(a, b, c)
Get on each one
const a = _.get(result, 'data.a', '') const b = _.get(result, 'data.b', '') const c = _.get(result, 'data.c', '') console.log(a, b, c)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Spread
Get on each one
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
10 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/138.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 138 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Spread
95784.2 Ops/sec
Get on each one
80759.8 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
lodash.each vs Object.forEach
Object Omit 2
_.get vs nativefeaf
Lodash isEmpty vs Object.keys().length
remeda vs lodash vs ramda
vanilla vs lodash array difference
Lodash isEmpty vs Object.entries().length
Lodash isEmpty vs Object.keys().length not empty
Lodash isEmpty vs Object.keys().length not empty 1234
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?