Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
klona vs RFDC clone vs Lodash cloneDeep vs JSON Clone 2025
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
Lodash cloneDeep vs Json clone vs RFDC copy vs klona copy
Created:
10 months ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/rfdc@1.4.1/index.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.21/lodash.min.js"></script> <script src="https://unpkg.com/klona@2.0.6/json/index.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var sampleObject = [{ "id": "0001", "type": "donut", "name": "Cake", "ppu": 0.55, "batters": { "batter": [{ "id": "1001", "type": "Regular" }, { "id": "1002", "type": "Chocolate" }, { "id": "1003", "type": "Blueberry" }, { "id": "1004", "type": "Devil's Food" } ] }, "topping": [{ "id": "5001", "type": "None" }, { "id": "5002", "type": "Glazed" }, { "id": "5005", "type": "Sugar" }, { "id": "5007", "type": "Powdered Sugar" }, { "id": "5006", "type": "Chocolate with Sprinkles" }, { "id": "5003", "type": "Chocolate" }, { "id": "5004", "type": "Maple" } ] }, { "id": "0002", "type": "donut", "name": "Raised", "ppu": 0.55, "batters": { "batter": [{ "id": "1001", "type": "Regular" }] }, "topping": [{ "id": "5001", "type": "None" }, { "id": "5002", "type": "Glazed" }, { "id": "5005", "type": "Sugar" }, { "id": "5003", "type": "Chocolate" }, { "id": "5004", "type": "Maple" } ] }, { "id": "0003", "type": "donut", "name": "Old Fashioned", "ppu": 0.55, "batters": { "batter": [{ "id": "1001", "type": "Regular" }, { "id": "1002", "type": "Chocolate" } ] }, "topping": [{ "id": "5001", "type": "None" }, { "id": "5002", "type": "Glazed" }, { "id": "5003", "type": "Chocolate" }, { "id": "5004", "type": "Maple" } ] } ]; var myCopy = null; var rfdcClone = rfdc();
Tests:
Lodash cloneDeep
myCopy = _.cloneDeep(sampleObject);
Json clone
myCopy = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(sampleObject));
RFDC copy
myCopy = rfdcClone(sampleObject);
klona copy
myCopy = klona(sampleObject);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Lodash cloneDeep
Json clone
RFDC copy
klona copy
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
10 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/18.5 Safari/605.1.15
Browser/OS:
Safari 18 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Lodash cloneDeep
144749.7 Ops/sec
Json clone
357785.5 Ops/sec
RFDC copy
559379.9 Ops/sec
klona copy
1174809.5 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
RFDC clone vs Lodash cloneDeep vs JSON Clone
RFDC clone vs Lodash cloneDeep vs JSON Parse
RFDC clone vs Lodash clone vs JSON Clone
klona vs RFDC clone vs Lodash cloneDeep vs JSON Clone
RFDC clone vs Lodash cloneDeep vs JSON Parse 123
RFDC clone vs Lodash cloneDeep vs JSON Clone vs structured clone
RFDC clone vs Lodash cloneDeep vs JSON Clone vs structuredClone
RFDC clone vs Lodash cloneDeep vs JSON Clone : Dup
RFDC clone vs Lodash cloneDeep vs JSON Clone vs Clone
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?