textContent vs innerHTML vs innerText vs (version: 1)

ff

Comparing performance of: textc vs innerh vs innert

Created: one year ago by: Guest
Go to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
Script Preparation code:
Tests:

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 5 community runs

Desktop Results:
Chrome 5 runs
innert
9.5M/s
innerh
6.7M/s
textc
6.2M/s

Fastest: innert (1.5x faster)

View exact numbers
  • ✓ innert: 9,519,672 ops/sec
  • • innerh: 6,683,199 ops/sec
  • • textc: 6,181,578 ops/sec

Results show median performance across all community submissions. Run this benchmark yourself to verify on your device.

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    textc
    innerh
    innert

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: 5 months ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/144.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Chrome 144 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
textc
20.6M/s
innerh
18.9M/s
innert
14.3M/s
View exact numbers
Test name Executions per second
✓ textc 20,625,794 Ops/sec
innerh 18,946,860 Ops/sec
innert 14,305,015 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks