Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
shortid
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
nanoid vs crypto.randomUUID vs custom
Created:
10 months ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script type="module"> import { v4 as uuidv4, v1 as uuidv1 } from 'https://jspm.dev/uuid'; import {ulid} from "https://jspm.dev/ulid"; import {createId, init} from "https://jspm.dev/@paralleldrive/cuid2"; import {nanoid} from "https://jspm.dev/nanoid"; window.nanoid = nanoid; window.custom = Date.now() + Math.random()).toString(36).replace('.', '') console.log("uuidv4", uuidv4()); console.log("uuidv1", uuidv1()); console.log("ulid", ulid()); console.log("cuid2", window.cuid2()); console.log("cuid2_32", window.cuid2_32()); console.log("nanoid", nanoid()); console.log("crypto.randomUUID", crypto.randomUUID()); </script>
Tests:
nanoid
nanoid()
crypto.randomUUID
crypto.randomUUID()
custom
custom()
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
nanoid
crypto.randomUUID
custom
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?