Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Reduce vs Map + FromEntries vs for loop vs map
(version: 1)
Original benchmark was unfairly forcing the for loop to be slower through variable declaration and destructuring.
Comparing performance of:
reduce vs map + fromEntries vs for loop vs map
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
const data = Array.from(Array(10000).keys()); const dataObject = Object.entries(data)
Tests:
reduce
dataObject.reduce((acc, [k, v]) => { acc[k] = v.toString(); return acc; }, {});
map + fromEntries
Object.fromEntries(dataObject.map(([k, v]) => ([k, v.toString()])));
for loop
const hashLookup = {} for (let i = 0; i < dataObject.length; i++) { hashLookup[i] = dataObject[i]; }
map
const hashLookup = {}; (dataObject ?? []).map((value, index) => hashLookup[index] = value);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
reduce
map + fromEntries
for loop
map
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:140.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/140.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 140 on Mac OS X 10.15
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=613414" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
for loop
46K/s
map
20K/s
reduce
10K/s
map + fromEntries
6K/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
for loop
46,383 Ops/sec
map
19,955 Ops/sec
reduce
10,198 Ops/sec
map + fromEntries
6,480 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks
Reduce vs Map+FromEntries vs for loop
Reduce vs Map+FromEntries vs for loop vs forEach
Object.fromEntries vs reduce vs Map - Corrected fromEntries
Reduce vs Map+FromEntries vs for loop vs forof loop
Reduce vs Map+FromEntries vs for loop vs forof loop vd
Reduce vs Map vs FromEntries vs for loop
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?