Benchmark: Count string period occurrence

Script Preparation code:

function regex(s) {
  var r = s.match(/[.．｡。]/g);
  if (r) return r.length;
  return 0;
}

function split(s) {
  return s.split(/[.．｡。]/).length - 1;
}

function forloopset(s, oc) {
  let c = 0;
  for (let i =0; i < s.length; i++){
  if (oc.has(s[i])) c++}
  return c;
}
 
function forloop(s) {
  let c = 0;
  for (let i =0; i < s.length; i++){
  if (s[i] ==="."|| s[i] === "．"|| s[i] === "｡"|| s[i] === "。") c++}
  return c;
}

Tests:

Use regex
regex("This is a pen. This is a pen｡ Another one.");
Use split with regex
split("This is a pen. This is a pen｡ Another one.");
Use forloopset
forloopset("This is a pen. This is a pen｡ Another one.", new Set([".","．","｡","。"]));
forloop2
forloop("This is a pen. This is a pen｡ Another one.");

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Use regex
Use split with regex
Use forloopset
forloop2

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 11 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/136.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 136 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Use regex	8797397.0 Ops/sec
Use split with regex	7699239.5 Ops/sec
Use forloopset	2251794.2 Ops/sec
forloop2	11083674.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Count string period occurrence (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Use regex vs Use split with regex vs Use forloopset vs forloop2

Created: 11 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Use regex

Use split with regex

Use forloopset

forloop2

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A