Benchmark: reduce + spread vs map + flat

Script Preparation code:

function generateTestArray() {
  const result = [];
  for (let i = 0; i < 1000; ++i) {
    result.push({
      a: [i, i * 2, i * 3]
    });
  }
  return result;
}

Tests:

reduce + spread
const arr = generateTestArray(); const result = arr.reduce((acc, el) => { acc.push(...el.a); return acc; }, []);
map + flat
const arr = generateTestArray(); const result = arr.map(el => el.a).flat();

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
reduce + spread
map + flat

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 11 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 OPR/119.0.0.0

Browser/OS: Opera 119 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
reduce + spread	42496.7 Ops/sec
map + flat	19212.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Performance of JavaScript .forEach, .map and .reduce vs for and for..of
map vs for vs for (init array)
map vs reduce
ak;ldjf;lakdjf
Performance of JavaScript .forEach, .map and .reduce vs for and for..ofCXCcccc
Performance of JavaScript .forEach, .map and .reduce vs for and for..of (fork)
Performance of JavaScript .forEach, .map and .reduce vs for and for..of2
Performance of JavaScript .forEach, .map and .reduce vs for and for..of with 1000p
Performance of JavaScript .forEach, .map and .reduce vs for and for..of 2232132

reduce + spread vs map + flat (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: reduce + spread vs map + flat

Created: 11 months ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

reduce + spread

map + flat

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A