Benchmark: Array for vs Array for of vs Set for of vs Map for of

HTML Preparation code:

<div id='test'></div>

Script Preparation code:

function fn() {}
var arr = new Array(100).fill(0).map((x, i) => i.toString());
var set = new Set(arr);
var map = new Map(arr.map((x, i) => [i, x]));

Tests:

Array for-loop
var t = 0; for(i=0, l = arr.length; i<l; i++){ t = arr[i] }
Array for..of
var t = 0; for (let value of arr) { t = value; }
Set for of
var t = 0; for (let value of set) { t = value; }
Map for of
var t = 0; for (let [key, value] of map) { t = value; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Array for-loop
Array for..of
Set for of
Map for of

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 11 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:139.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/139.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 139 on Ubuntu

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Array for-loop	6950976.0 Ops/sec
Array for..of	3705400.0 Ops/sec
Set for of	1017015.2 Ops/sec
Map for of	593425.9 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Array for vs Array for of vs Set for of vs Map for of (version: 1)

Testing the difference between native loops and find()

Comparing performance of: Array for-loop vs Array for..of vs Set for of vs Map for of

Created: 11 months ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Array for-loop

Array for..of

Set for of

Map for of

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A