Benchmark: Array-Map + Set.has vs Array.Find 2

Script Preparation code:

var a = [
  {id: 1, name: "1"},
  {id: 2, name: "1"},
  {id: 3, name: "1"},
  {id: 4, name: "1"},
  {id: 5, name: "1"},
  {id: 6, name: "1"},
  {id: 7, name: "1"},
  {id: 8, name: "1"},
  {id: 9, name: "1"},
  {id: 10, name: "1"},
];

Tests:

Find
return a.find(n => n.id === 9);
Map + Set
var b = new Set(a.map(item => item.id)); return b.has(9);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Find
Map + Set

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 11 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/136.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 136 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Find	78083872.0 Ops/sec
Map + Set	6365400.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

object key vs indexof
object keys vs loop
find vs some vs every
find vs some vs every forkedyo
set.has vs. array.includes 1e5
find vs some vs every vs for (break) vs for (return)
Test_every_2
For Push vs Map Test Oke
Array-Map + Set.has vs Array.Find

Array-Map + Set.has vs Array.Find 2 (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Find vs Map + Set

Created: 11 months ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Find

Map + Set

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A