Benchmark: PutImageData vs DrawImage with getImageData in preparation code

HTML Preparation code:

<canvas id='master' width='100' height='100'></canvas>
<canvas id='pid' width='100' height='100'></canvas>
<canvas id='di' width='100' height='100'></canvas>

Script Preparation code:

var master = document.getElementById('master');
var masterctx = master.getContext('2d');
var pid = document.getElementById('pid').getContext('2d');
var di = document.getElementById('di').getContext('2d');

masterctx.fillRect(0,0,50,50);
masterctx.fillStyle = "red";
masterctx.fillRect(50,50,100,100);
let imgData = masterctx.getImageData(0,0,100,100);

Tests:

DrawImage whole master into di canvas
di.drawImage(master,0,0);
PutImageData whole master into pid canvas
pid.putImageData(imgData,0,0);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
DrawImage whole master into di canvas
PutImageData whole master into pid canvas

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 7 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 128 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
DrawImage whole master into di canvas	885957.9 Ops/sec
PutImageData whole master into pid canvas	15375.7 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

PutImageData vs DrawImage with getImageData in preparation code (version: 1)

GetImageData with PutImageData vs just DrawImage

Comparing performance of: DrawImage whole master into di canvas vs PutImageData whole master into pid canvas

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

DrawImage whole master into di canvas

PutImageData whole master into pid canvas

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A