Benchmark: Arrow call vs bind vs call vs apply with bound options

Script Preparation code:

function test(msg) {
  var d = this.hello + msg
}

function testContext(self,msg) {
  var d = self.hello + msg
}

let opts = {
  hello:1,
  world:2
}

Tests:

arrow call
((msg)=>testContext(opts,"Hello"))()
bind
test.bind(opts, "Hello")();
call
test.call(opts, "Hello");
apply
test.apply(opts, ["Hello"]);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
arrow call
bind
call
apply

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one month ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/148.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 148 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
arrow call	160117664.0 Ops/sec
bind	160876128.0 Ops/sec
call	160867776.0 Ops/sec
apply	69123232.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Direct call vs bind vs call vs apply
Direct call vs bind vs call vs apply (don't re-create bound function every time)
Direct call vs bind vs call vs apply 2
direct vs bind vs apply vs call
Direct call vs bind vs call vs apply foosssdsad aas
Direct call vs bind vs call vs apply foosssdsad aasa
Direct call vs bind vs call vs apply v2
Direct call vs bind vs call vs apply vs static bound
Direct call vs bind vs call vs apply with bound options

Arrow call vs bind vs call vs apply with bound options (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: arrow call vs bind vs call vs apply

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

arrow call

bind

call

apply

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A