Benchmark: Arrow call vs bind vs call vs apply with bound options

Script Preparation code:

function test(msg) {
  var d = this.hello + msg
}

function testContext(self,msg) {
  var d = self.hello + msg
}

let opts = {
  hello:1,
  world:2
}

Tests:

arrow call
((msg)=>testContext(opts,"Hello"))()
bind
test.bind(opts, "Hello")();
call
test.call(opts, "Hello");
apply
test.apply(opts, ["Hello"]);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
arrow call
bind
call
apply

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/148.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 148 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

bind

160.9M/s

call

160.9M/s

arrow call

160.1M/s

apply

69.1M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ bind	160,876,128 Ops/sec
call	160,867,776 Ops/sec
arrow call	160,117,664 Ops/sec
apply	69,123,232 Ops/sec

Arrow call vs bind vs call vs apply with bound options (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `arrow call vs bind vs call vs apply`

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

arrow call

bind

call

apply

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Arrow call vs bind vs call vs apply with bound options (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: arrow call vs bind vs call vs apply

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

arrow call

bind

call

apply

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `arrow call vs bind vs call vs apply`