Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
avgBy reduce vs map first
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
reduce vs map then reduce
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/lodash/4.16.0/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var data = []; for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { data.push({ value: Math.random() * 100 }); } function getValue(obj) { return obj.value; }
Tests:
reduce
data.reduce((sum, obj) => sum + getValue(obj), 0) / data.length;
map then reduce
data.map(getValue).reduce((sum, val) => sum + val, 0) / data.length;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
reduce
map then reduce
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/135.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 135 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
reduce
893110.1 Ops/sec
map then reduce
140537.5 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
Lodash sumBy vs map and reduce
GroupBy vs Reduce
Unique Array: Lodash vs spread new Set vs reduce vs for - random data
Lodash sumBy vs forEach vs for vs map reduce
Lodash sumBy (value and map) vs reduce
Lodash meanBy vs JS (with small and large size)
Lodash meanBy vs js vs reduce lodash
avgBy reduce vs inline
avgBy test
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?