Math.min and Math.max vs reduce vs for for vs Math.min.apply 100000 items. (version: 2)

Comparing performance of: Math.Min vs Reduce for min vs For for min vs For of for min vs Math.min.apply

Created: one year ago by: Registered User
Go to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
Tests:

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 5 community runs

Desktop Results:
Chrome 5 runs
For for min
5K/s
Reduce for min
592/s
Math.min.apply
137/s
Math.Min
134/s
For of for min
97/s

Fastest: For for min (50.3x faster)

View exact numbers
  • ✓ For for min: 4,894 ops/sec
  • • Reduce for min: 592 ops/sec
  • • Math.min.apply: 137 ops/sec
  • • Math.Min: 134 ops/sec
  • • For of for min: 97 ops/sec

Results show median performance across all community submissions. Run this benchmark yourself to verify on your device.

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    Math.Min
    Reduce for min
    For for min
    For of for min
    Math.min.apply

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/60.5 Safari/605.1.15
Safari 60 on Ubuntu
View result in a separate tab
For for min
13K/s
Math.min.apply
4K/s
Reduce for min
4K/s
Math.Min
2K/s
For of for min
43/s
View exact numbers
Test name Executions per second
✓ For for min 13,006 Ops/sec
Math.min.apply 4,276 Ops/sec
Reduce for min 3,892 Ops/sec
Math.Min 2,038 Ops/sec
For of for min 43 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks