Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Object.assign vs spread operatorasdasdsadas
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Object.assign vs spread operator
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Object.assign
var objects = {}; for (var x = 0; x < 1000; x++) { objects[x] = 'etc'; } var other = Object.assign({ a: 2 }, objects);
spread operator
var objects = {}; for (var x = 0; x < 1000; x++) { objects[x] = 'etc'; } var other = { a: 2, ...objects };
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Object.assign
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Benchmark Overview** The provided benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two approaches for assigning objects in JavaScript: `Object.assign()` and the spread operator (`...`). **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **Object.assign()**: A built-in JavaScript method that assigns properties from one or more source objects to a target object. 2. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: A syntax feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) that allows spreading the properties of an object into another object. **Pros and Cons** **Object.assign()** Pros: * Widely supported across browsers and versions * Efficient, as it only copies a subset of the original object's properties * Can be used with multiple source objects Cons: * May lead to slower performance due to overhead from method invocation and property iteration * Can result in slower execution when dealing with large datasets **Spread Operator (`...`)** Pros: * Generally faster than `Object.assign()`, as it avoids the overhead of method invocation and property iteration * More concise and expressive code * Supports object destructuring and rest parameter syntax Cons: * Not supported across older browsers or versions (e.g., Internet Explorer, older Chrome/ Firefox) * May not work correctly in all situations (e.g., when dealing with nested objects) **Other Considerations** When choosing between `Object.assign()` and the spread operator, consider the following factors: * Performance: If speed is crucial, the spread operator might be a better choice. * Code readability and conciseness: The spread operator can lead to more compact and expressive code. * Browser support: Ensure that your target browsers support the spread operator. **Library Usage** None of the provided benchmark test cases use any external libraries or dependencies. However, if you were to extend this benchmark to include other libraries or frameworks, consider using popular ones like Lodash (for utility functions) or jQuery (for DOM manipulation). **Special JS Features or Syntax** The provided benchmark does not mention any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond the spread operator. **Alternative Benchmarks** Other alternatives for measuring object assignment performance might include: 1. Creating an array of objects and then assigning them to another array using `Array.prototype.push()`. 2. Using a library like Lodash's `cloneDeep()` function. 3. Implementing your own custom object assignment method (e.g., by iterating over the properties). Keep in mind that these alternatives might not provide identical results or comparable performance characteristics, so it's essential to tailor your benchmark to your specific use case and requirements. If you'd like me to explain anything further or elaborate on any of the points mentioned above, please feel free to ask!
Related benchmarks:
toFixed -> Number vs Math.round
toFixed() vs Math.round().toString()
toFixed() vs String(Math.floor()
toFixed vs Math.round() with numbers222
toFixed vs Math.round vs |(bitwise or)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?