Benchmark: Object.values for, forEach vs Object for-in overhead cost

Script Preparation code:

var myObj = {};
for (var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
    myObj['val' + i] = 'val' + i;
}

Tests:

Object.values for
var objValues = Object.values(myObj); var myStr = ''; for (var i = 0; i < objValues.length; i++) { myStr += objValues[i]; }
Object.values forEach
var myStr = ''; Object.values(myObj).forEach(el => myStr += el);
Object for-in
var myStr = ''; for (const o in myObj) { myStr += myObj[o]; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Object.values for
Object.values forEach
Object for-in

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 8 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:145.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/145.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 145 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Object.values for

174K/s

Object.values forEach

143K/s

Object for-in

79K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Object.values for	173,517 Ops/sec
Object.values forEach	142,830 Ops/sec
Object for-in	78,636 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

The benchmark defined is focused on analyzing the performance overhead of different methods used to iterate over the properties of a JavaScript object. Specifically, it compares three approaches:

1. **Using `Object.values()` with a `for` loop**:  
   - **Test Case**: 
     ```javascript
     var objValues = Object.values(myObj);
     var myStr = '';
     for (var i = 0; i < objValues.length; i++) {
         myStr += objValues[i];
     }
     ```
   - **Pros**: 
     - `Object.values()` returns an array of the object's values, which can be iterated over using a standard `for` loop.
     - This approach is typically fast, as it allows direct access to the array indices.
   - **Cons**: 
     - The initial call to `Object.values()` creates a new array, which incurs a performance and memory overhead, especially with large objects.

2. **Using `Object.values()` with `forEach`**:  
   - **Test Case**:
     ```javascript
     var myStr = '';
     Object.values(myObj).forEach(el => myStr += el);
     ```
   - **Pros**: 
     - This syntax is quite succinct and leverages the functional style of JavaScript, making it easier to read and understand.
   - **Cons**: 
     - It can be slower than a plain `for` loop. The `forEach` method involves a function call for each element, which adds overhead compared to the iterative approach.

3. **Using a `for-in` loop**:  
   - **Test Case**:
     ```javascript
     var myStr = '';
     for (const o in myObj) {
         myStr += myObj[o];
     }
     ```
   - **Pros**:
     - The `for-in` loop directly iterates over the object's enumerable properties without requiring additional data structures, which can save on memory.
   - **Cons**:
     - This approach may include inherited properties if the object's prototype has any enumerable properties, unless filtered out with `hasOwnProperty`.
     - Performance can vary across browsers and environments; it is generally slower than standard loops because of the way property enumeration works.

### Benchmark Results Analysis
The test results indicate how many times each method was executed per second (ExecutionsPerSecond):

- **Object.values for**: 73,408.38
- **Object.values forEach**: 49,388.87
- **Object for-in**: 30,124.44

From the results, we can infer that using `Object.values()` in combination with a traditional `for` loop is the fastest method, followed by `Object.values()` with `forEach`, and then the `for-in` loop.

### Other Considerations
- Performance can vary significantly depending on the JavaScript engine and the complexity and size of the objects being traversed.
- In modern JavaScript, where performance is crucial, the choice of iteration method can significantly impact performance-sensitive applications.
- Alternatives such as `Object.entries()` (which provides both keys and values) or using modern iteration methods (e.g., `for...of` with `Object.values()`) could be explored, though those approaches may also have their own performance implications based on how they manipulate or access data.

In conclusion, developers should choose an iteration strategy based on the specific use case, performance requirements, and code readability. Optimizations should always be informed by profiling data relevant to their applications.

Object.values for, forEach vs Object for-in overhead cost (version: 2)

Comparing performance of: `Object.values for vs Object.values forEach vs Object for-in`

Created: one year ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

Object.values for

Object.values forEach

Object for-in

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated one year ago):

Object.values for, forEach vs Object for-in overhead cost (version: 2)

Comparing performance of: Object.values for vs Object.values forEach vs Object for-in

Created: one year ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

Object.values for

Object.values forEach

Object for-in

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Object.values for vs Object.values forEach vs Object for-in`