Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
new Date().getTime() vs new Date().toISOString()
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
timestamp = Date.now(); vs timestamp = new Date().toISOString();
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var timestamp = null;
Tests:
timestamp = Date.now();
timestamp = new Date().getTime();
timestamp = new Date().toISOString();
timestamp = new Date().toISOString();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
timestamp = Date.now();
timestamp = new Date().toISOString();
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
5 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/26.1 Safari/605.1.15
Browser/OS:
Safari 26 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
timestamp = Date.now();
36152848.0 Ops/sec
timestamp = new Date().toISOString();
9793853.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
Date.now() vs new Date().getTime()
Date.now() vs new Date().getTime() vs +new Date()
new Date().toISOString() vs new Date().toLocaleString()
Date.now() vs new Date().getTime(q)
Date.now() vs new Date().getTime(qu)
Date.now() vs new Date().getTime() vs + new Date
Date.now() vs +new Date() vs new Date().getTime();
Date.now() vs new Date().toISOString()
Date.now() vs new Date().getTime()1
Date.now() vs new Date().getTime() 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?