Benchmark: _.compact vs filter

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/2.4.1/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var data = [];
data.length = 50000;

for (var i = 0; i < data.length; ++i) {
  data[i] = { key: 1000 + i * 10, something: "abc_" + i };
  if (i % 10 === 0) data[i] = null;    
}

Tests:

_.compact
var res = _.compact(data);
filter
var res = data.filter(x => x != null)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
_.compact
filter

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/135.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 135 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
_.compact	3081.8 Ops/sec
filter	1275.7 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

sdgsfgsdfhgfd
filter Lodash vs Vanilla
unique elements in array using filter with 20000 items
Spread vs if/else
lodash groupBy vs filter 100k v1
keyby or map
Compare lodash.get with native code
_.filter.length vs filter.length vs reduce.length
_.forEach vs for of

_.compact vs filter (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: _.compact vs filter

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

_.compact

filter

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A