Benchmark: hash checkl - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

var array = Array.from({length: 40}, () => Math.floor(Math.random() * 140));

Tests:

Set spread
const f = [... new Set(array)]
Array from set
const s = new Set(array) const l = Array.from(s)
Filter with set
const s = new Set() const b = array.filter((i) => s.has(i) ? false : (s.add(i), true))
Hash object
const s = {} const b = array.filter((i) => s.hasOwnProperty(i) ? false : (s[i] = true))

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Set spread
Array from set
Filter with set
Hash object

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:137.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/137.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 137 on Mac OS X 10.15

View result in a separate tab

Array from set

1.5M/s

Hash object

1.4M/s

Filter with set

1.3M/s

Set spread

1.2M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Array from set	1,541,406 Ops/sec
Hash object	1,361,532 Ops/sec
Filter with set	1,289,463 Ops/sec
Set spread	1,208,406 Ops/sec

hash checkl (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `Set spread vs Array from set vs Filter with set vs Hash object`

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Set spread

Array from set

Filter with set

Hash object

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

hash checkl (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Set spread vs Array from set vs Filter with set vs Hash object

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Set spread

Array from set

Filter with set

Hash object

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Set spread vs Array from set vs Filter with set vs Hash object`