Benchmark: Array Intersection vs. Lodash part 3 vs. Native Set Intersection Optimized

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var first = [...Array(100)].map(it => ~~(Math.random() * 1000));
var second = [...Array(20)].map(it => ~~(Math.random() * 1000));
const firstSet = new Set(first);
const secondSet = new Set(second);

Tests:

Lodash intersection
_.intersection(first, second)
Javascript Array intersection
first.filter(it => second.includes(it))
Native Set intersection
firstSet.intersection(secondSet);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lodash intersection
Javascript Array intersection
Native Set intersection

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/135.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 135 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Lodash intersection	454896.8 Ops/sec
Javascript Array intersection	790458.4 Ops/sec
Native Set intersection	6255160.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Array Intersection vs. Lodash part 3 vs. Native Set Intersection Optimized (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Lodash intersection vs Javascript Array intersection vs Native Set intersection

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Lodash intersection

Javascript Array intersection

Native Set intersection

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A