Number.toFixed(2).replace(_DOT_, _COMMA_) vs Number.toLocaleString (version: 1)

Checks if it's faster to use Number.toLocaleString or to format a Number toFixed(2) and then string replace the decimal separator to use a comma.

Comparing performance of: Number.toFixed(2).replace(_DOT_, _COMMA_) vs Number.toLocaleString

Created: one year ago by: Guest
Go to the latest result
Tests:
Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    Number.toFixed(2).replace(_DOT_, _COMMA_)
    Number.toLocaleString

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/135.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Chrome 135 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Number.toFixed(2).replace(_DOT_, _COMMA_)
17.6M/s
Number.toLocaleString
96K/s
View exact numbers
Test name Executions per second
✓ Number.toFixed(2).replace(_DOT_, _COMMA_) 17,579,948 Ops/sec
Number.toLocaleString 96,087 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks