Benchmark: TextDecoder compared to String.fromCharCode

Script Preparation code:

const testLength = 1000;
const startSlice = 300;
const endSlice = 700;

const getRandomCharCode = () => Math.floor(Math.random() * 26) + 97; // a-z letters
const bytes = Array.from({length: testLength}, () => getRandomCharCode());

var buffer = new Uint8Array(bytes);
var decoder = new TextDecoder(); // default 'utf-8' or 'utf8'

Tests:

String.fromCharCode, subarray
String.fromCharCode(...buffer.subarray(startSlice, endSlice));
TextDecoder, new uint8array
const slice = new Uint8Array(buffer.buffer, startSlice, endSlice - startSlice); decoder.decode(slice);
TextDecoder, subarray
decoder.decode(buffer.subarray(startSlice, endSlice))

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
String.fromCharCode, subarray
TextDecoder, new uint8array
TextDecoder, subarray

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 4 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:145.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/145.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 145 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
String.fromCharCode, subarray	13930.8 Ops/sec
TextDecoder, new uint8array	255830.1 Ops/sec
TextDecoder, subarray	428186.2 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

TextDecoder compared to String.fromCharCode (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: String.fromCharCode, subarray vs TextDecoder, new uint8array vs TextDecoder, subarray

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

String.fromCharCode, subarray

TextDecoder, new uint8array

TextDecoder, subarray

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A