Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Map (Native vs Ramda vs Lodash) indexed
(version: 0)
measures the speed of ramda's map vs Array's native map vs lodash map
Comparing performance of:
Ramda vs Array (native) vs Lodash
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script> <script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
function double(n) { return n*2; } var data = [...Array(20)].map((v, idx) => idx); var mapIndexed = R.addIndex(R.map);
Tests:
Ramda
mapIndexed(double, data);
Array (native)
data.map(double);
Lodash
_.map(data, double);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Ramda
Array (native)
Lodash
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and its components. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is designed to measure the performance of three different approaches for mapping over an array: Ramda, Array's native map function, and Lodash's map function. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code defines a simple function `double` that takes a number as input and returns its double value. An array `data` is created using `[...Array(20)].map((v, idx) => idx);`, which generates an array of numbers from 0 to 19. **Html Preparation Code** The HTML preparation code includes two external libraries: Ramda and Lodash. These libraries are used for the benchmarking test cases. **Individual Test Cases** There are three test cases: 1. **Ramda**: The first test case uses Ramda's `mapIndexed` function to apply the `double` function to each element in the array, while preserving its index. 2. **Array (native)**: The second test case uses JavaScript's native `map` function to apply the `double` function to each element in the array. 3. **Lodash**: The third test case uses Lodash's `map` function to apply the `double` function to each element in the array. **Library Descriptions** * **Ramda**: Ramda is a functional programming library for JavaScript that provides a set of higher-order functions and data structures for working with arrays, objects, and other data types. + Purpose: Provides a concise and expressive way to work with data using functional programming principles. * **Lodash**: Lodash is a utility library for JavaScript that provides a comprehensive set of functions for working with arrays, objects, and other data types. + Purpose: Provides a wide range of useful functions for common tasks such as array manipulation, object manipulation, and more. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The benchmark uses the `mapIndexed` function from Ramda, which is a higher-order function that applies a given function to each element in an array while preserving its index. This feature allows for concise and expressive way of mapping over arrays with additional context. **Other Alternatives** If Ramda or Lodash were not used, alternative approaches could be: * Using vanilla JavaScript's `forEach` method instead of `map` * Implementing a custom loop to iterate over the array * Using a library like jQuery or React to manipulate the DOM However, using built-in functions like `map` and libraries like Ramda and Lodash are generally more efficient and expressive ways to work with data in JavaScript.
Related benchmarks:
Map (Native vs Rambda vs Lodash)
Map (Native vs Ramda vs Lodash) latest 2021-01-18
Map (Native vs Ramda vs Lodash) v2
Map (Native vs Ramda 0.27.2 vs Lodash 4.17.21) 50k
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?