Benchmark: Lodash Difference vs. Filter

HTML Preparation code:

<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.10/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var a = ["America", "Brazil", "China", "Denmark", "Equador", "Finland", "Germany", "Haiti", "Indonesia", "Japan", "Kiribati"]
var b = ["Haiti", "Indonesia", "Japan", "Kiribati"]

Tests:

Lodash
var c = _.difference(a, b)
Filter
var c = a.filter(x => b.includes(x));

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lodash
Filter

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/136.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/136.0.0.0

Browser/OS: Chrome 136 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Lodash	1795754.2 Ops/sec
Filter	532684.1 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

lodash.each vs Object.forEach
filter Lodash vs Vanilla
Lodash: difference vs filter
_.difference vs. native
Lodash: differenceBy vs filter & some
foreach vs some and filter
lodash difference vs array filter
filter vs lodash diff1
filter vs lodash diff2

Lodash Difference vs. Filter (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Lodash vs Filter

Created: one year ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Lodash

Filter

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A