Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match with case insensitivity
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
RegEx.test vs String.includes vs String.match
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var string = "Hello world!"; var regex = /Hello/i;
Tests:
RegEx.test
regex.test(string);
String.includes
string.toLowerCase().includes("Hello".toLowerCase());
String.match
string.match("Hello");
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
RegEx.test
String.includes
String.match
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/135.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 135 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=599451" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
String.includes
157.8M/s
RegEx.test
46.6M/s
String.match
6.4M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
String.includes
157,806,928 Ops/sec
RegEx.test
46,558,752 Ops/sec
String.match
6,383,480 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match insensitive
RegEx.test vs. String.toLowerCase().includes vs. String.match
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match with lowercase
RegEx.test vs. String.includes 3
Case Insensitive RegEx.test vs. String.includes
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?