Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match with case insensitivity
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
RegEx.test vs String.includes vs String.match
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var string = "Hello world!"; var regex = /Hello/i;
Tests:
RegEx.test
regex.test(string);
String.includes
string.toLowerCase().includes("Hello".toLowerCase());
String.match
string.match("Hello");
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
RegEx.test
String.includes
String.match
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/135.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 135 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
RegEx.test
46558752.0 Ops/sec
String.includes
157806928.0 Ops/sec
String.match
6383480.5 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match insensitive
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match in case insensitive scenarios
RegEx.test vs. String.toLowerCase().includes vs. String.match
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.search (All case insensitive)
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match Case Insensitive
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match (case-insensitive)
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match with lowercase
RegEx.test vs. String.includes 3
Case Insensitive RegEx.test vs. String.includes
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?