Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Frozen object access vs ordinary object access
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
Frozen object access vs Ordinary object access
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
const obj = {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3, d: 4}; const sealedObj = Object.freeze({a: 1, b: 2, c: 3, d: 4, __proto__: null}); let v = null;
Tests:
Frozen object access
v = sealedObj.a; v = sealedObj.b; v = sealedObj.c; v = sealedObj.d;
Ordinary object access
v = obj.a; v = obj.b; v = obj.c; v = obj.d;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Frozen object access
Ordinary object access
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
7 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/26.2 Safari/605.1.15
Browser/OS:
Safari 26 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Frozen object access
316.6M/s
Ordinary object access
296.9M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
Frozen object access
316,626,112 Ops/sec
Ordinary object access
296,862,848 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks
Object.freeze vs Object.seal
Object.freeze vs Object.seal with array
Object.freeze vs Object.seal - Access only
Sealed object access vs ordinary object access
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?