Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
sdfgsdfg
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Lodash vs Native
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
window.obj = {}; for (var i = 0, len = 10000; i < len; i++) { var arr = [] obj['key' + i] = arr for (var n = 0, len = 10; n < len; n++) { arr.push({ ['key' + n]: n }); } }
Tests:
Lodash
const a2 = _.clone(arr)
Native
const a3 = arr.slice()
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Lodash
Native
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the benchmark explanation for you. **Benchmark Overview** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark created on MeasureThat.net. The benchmark tests two approaches to cloning an array in JavaScript: using Lodash and native JavaScript functions. **Script Preparation Code** The Script Preparation Code is used to prepare the test environment: ```javascript window.obj = {}; for (var i = 0, len = 10000; i < len; i++) { var arr = []; obj['key' + i] = arr; for (var n = 0, len = 10; n < len; n++) { arr.push({ ['key' + n]: n }); } } ``` This code creates a large array `arr` with 10000 elements, each containing an object with two properties: `key` and `value`. The resulting array is stored in the `obj` object. **Html Preparation Code** The Html Preparation Code includes a reference to Lodash: ```html <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script> ``` This script tag loads the Lodash library, which is used in one of the benchmark test cases. **Benchmark Test Cases** There are two individual test cases: 1. **Lodash**: `const a2 = _.clone(arr)` * This test case uses the `_clone` function from Lodash to clone the `arr` array. * The purpose of this test is to measure the performance of Lodash's cloning functionality. 2. **Native**: `const a3 = arr.slice()` * This test case uses the built-in `slice()` method to clone the `arr` array. * The purpose of this test is to measure the performance of native JavaScript's cloning functionality. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: 1. **Lodash**: * Pros: Lodash provides a simple and efficient way to clone arrays, with a well-documented API. * Cons: Using an external library may introduce additional overhead due to the weight of the library itself, as well as potential differences in performance compared to native JavaScript implementations. 2. **Native (slice())**: * Pros: This approach is lightweight and does not require loading any external libraries, making it a good choice for pure JavaScript applications. * Cons: The `slice()` method may be less efficient than Lodash's cloning functionality, especially for large arrays. **Library Considerations** Lodash is a popular utility library that provides various functional programming helpers. In this benchmark, the `_clone` function is used to clone arrays, which is a common use case in JavaScript development. **Special JS Features or Syntax** None of the test cases use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what is commonly available in modern browsers. **Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative cloning approaches, here are some other options: * `Array.prototype.map()`: This method creates a new array by applying a transformation to each element of the original array. * `Array.prototype.reduce()`: This method applies a reduction function to each element of the original array and returns a single value. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics compared to Lodash's cloning functionality or native JavaScript's `slice()` method.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash vs Native reduce on object x100
lodash flatten vs reduce
Lodash vs Native reduce + Object.keys for collections
lodash flatMapDeep vs reduce
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?