Benchmark: checkUrl protocol indexOf vs RegExp

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

    let value = {
      image: 'sdp://sad/asda/ddeeerr/path/path/sss/aasedd/t4/e3/2w/3w/45d/',
      source: ''
    }

Tests:

if
if (value.image.indexOf('skin://') === 0) { value.image = value.image.replace('skin://', ''); value.source = 'skin'; } if (value.image.indexOf('config://') === 0) { value.image = value.image.replace('config://', ''); value.source = 'config'; } if (value.image.indexOf('sdp://') === 0) { value.image = value.image.replace('sdp://', ''); value.source = 'sdp'; }
regExp
value.image.replace(/^(skin|config|sdp):\/\//, (s1, s2) => { value.source = s2; return '' });

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
if
regExp

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 23 days ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/132.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 132 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
if	9244236.0 Ops/sec
regExp	16112942.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated 23 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

The benchmark described tests two different approaches to parsing and modifying a URL-like string using JavaScript: one using simple conditional checks with `indexOf`, and the other using a regular expression (RegExp). Both methods aim to identify a specific prefix in the given string, remove it, and set a corresponding `source` value based on the identified prefix. Here’s a breakdown of each approach:

### Approaches Compared:

1. **Conditional Checks with indexOf**:
    - **Test Name**: "if"
    - **Benchmark Definition**:
      ```javascript
      if (value.image.indexOf('skin://') === 0) {
          value.image = value.image.replace('skin://', '');
          value.source = 'skin';
      }
      if (value.image.indexOf('config://') === 0) {
          value.image = value.image.replace('config://', '');
          value.source = 'config';
      }
      if (value.image.indexOf('sdp://') === 0) {
          value.image = value.image.replace('sdp://', '');
          value.source = 'sdp';
      }
      ```
    - **Pros**:
        - Simplicity: This method is straightforward to understand and does not require knowledge of regular expressions.
        - Explicitness: Each condition is clearly defined, making it easy to see which prefixes are being checked.
    - **Cons**:
        - Verbosity: Each check requires multiple lines of code, which can become cumbersome if more prefixes are added.
        - Performance: As the number of conditions increases, this approach may lead to longer execution times for complex cases, as all checks must be evaluated in sequence.

2. **Regular Expression**:
    - **Test Name**: "regExp"
    - **Benchmark Definition**:
      ```javascript
      value.image.replace(/^(skin|config|sdp):\\/\\//, (s1, s2) => {
          value.source = s2;
          return '';
      });
      ```
    - **Pros**:
        - Conciseness: This method condenses the logic into a single line, making the code shorter and potentially easier to maintain.
        - Flexibility: Regular expressions can handle more complex patterns and can be modified to match different rules without significant changes to the structure.
    - **Cons**:
        - Complexity: Understanding regular expressions can be difficult for those unfamiliar with them. They require a different mindset compared to simple string methods.
        - Readability: The code may be less readable, especially for developers who are not well-versed with regex syntax and concepts.

### Benchmark Results:

The benchmark results show that the regular expression approach ("regExp") has significantly better performance than the conditional checks ("if"), with approximately 16 million executions per second versus around 9 million for the `indexOf` checks. This indicates that the RegExp-based solution is faster for the specified task, likely due to its ability to handle the matching and modification in a single operation.

### Considerations and Other Alternatives:

1. **Performance**: Depending on the context in which these checks are used, the performance may vary with different string sizes and content. If performance is critical, the RegExp solution is clearly superior based on the provided benchmarks.

2. **Maintainability**: While the regex approach is more performant, future developers who maintain the code may need to have a clear understanding of regex patterns. Thus, a balance between performance and readability should be struck, depending on the team’s expertise.

3. **Alternative Methods**:
   - **Using String.startsWith**: This is a more modern approach (part of ECMAScript 6) to check if a string starts with a given substring which can improve readability:
     ```javascript
     if (value.image.startsWith('skin://')) { ... }
     ```
   - **URL Interface**: For parsing URLs, the URL constructor could be used (when applicable), which provides a robust way to handle URLs:
     ```javascript
     let url = new URL(value.image);
     // Extract parts and manipulate here
     ```

In conclusion, both methods are valid, and the choice between them should consider factors such as performance needs, developer familiarity, maintainability, and the complexity of the strings being handled.

Related benchmarks:

checkUrl protocol indexOf vs RegExp (version: 2)

Comparing performance of: if vs regExp

Created: 23 days ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

if

regExp

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated 23 days ago):