Benchmark: Mapping arrayike

HTML Preparation code:

<div>hello></div><div>hello></div><div>hello></div><div>hello></div><div>hello></div><div>hello></div><div>hello></div><div>hello></div><div>hello></div><div>hello></div><div>hello></div><div>hello></div><div>hello></div><div>hello></div><div>hello></div><div>hello></div>

Script Preparation code:

let o = document.getElementsByTagName('div')
function map(o) {
return o.textContent}

Tests:

Array.from
Array.from(o,map)
.map.call
[].map.call(o,map)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Array.from
.map.call

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS x86_64 14541.0.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/132.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 132 on Chrome OS 14541.0.0

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Array.from	52013.9 Ops/sec
.map.call	61443.9 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

test1_Has_Is
array.from vs array slice with querySelectorAll
Array.from vs Spread on querySelectorAll
TestJSIntl
appendChild vs. insertAdjacentHTML
appendChild vs. insertAdjacentHTML x1000
appendChild v. insertAdjacentHTML
replaceChildren vs removechild
textContent vs replaceChildren divs

Mapping arrayike (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Array.from vs .map.call

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Array.from

.map.call

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A